Random thoughts and/or articles on running, track/field and various subjects (e.g. wine, life, health, nothing, etc).

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Random.......



I’m standing around the posted race results at a recent 5K. Standing next to me, was a mature gentleman perusing times by age group.

A couple standing nearby asked the silver fox, ‘How did it go today?’

He replied, ‘I ran well and won my age group.’

The couple then asked, ‘Which age group?’

'The over 80', answered the sage.

The couple spoke in tandem, ‘Wow, you’re still very fast.’

The wise man then said, ‘No, not really. I’ve just been able to outlive my competition.’

Priceless....................

Thursday, February 24, 2011

The Incident

An additional paragraph or two for the "running memoirs"........this one, of course, 
belongs in the chapter- "animals".


This morning's run started as usual, slow and easy, heading north from home.
Upon reaching Old Eustis Rd & Donnelly St, I proceeded west, down the hill 
on Old Eustis Rd. It was on the downhill that the ground shook like the streets 
of Pamplona. (Please allow me to embellish).

Fast approaching from a neighbor's yard was a bull, well it seemed like one, 
in the darkness and fog. This was no ordinary bull, but a giant Rottweiler, barking 
and covering ground at the speed of light. I came to a complete stop, as there was 
no way I'd out run this beast (even if he was over weight). This massive canine was 
looking for breakfast and I was on the menu. It was my quick thinking dog instincts 
(?? or was it fright) that made me scream and yell at him. It worked, he stopped,
for a second or two.

He then made another loud barking charge, only to be met by more of my screaming 
and yelling. He came to another stop, after a second or two of braking, just like a run 
away freight train. I then gave him a good boy, go home command. He just stood and 
gazed his fierce eyes at my meat and bones. He wanted breakfast really bad, 
he could taste it, but not to be.

I then, slowly walked away never turning my back at him. Once I was out of sight, 
I started running again. Well, truthfully my legs were a bit wobbly after meeting 
my new friend.

Have a nice day CUJO, see you again soon!!!

--
*****************
run for your life
*****************

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Run for your life

The Shay story is very near and dear to me.......
O.

************************************************************

Sometimes the questions are complicated 
and the answers are simple.
Dr. Seuss

***********************************************************


New York Times

Finding Her Way a Step at a Time

By JOHN BRANCH
Published: October 30, 2010

FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. — Alicia Shay occasionally finds herself across town, crying in front of the house that she and her husband once shared on Ponderosa Parkway. She cannot bring herself to pull their two favorite George Strait compact discs out of the changer in the Ford pickup. They have been in there for years.
John Burcham for The New York Times
Alicia Shay, before a morning run, logs abut 60 miles a week.


John Burcham for The New York Times
Shay, with her dog, Cody, met her husband, Ryan, in New York in 2005. In 2007, he died in a race in Central Park.
John Burcham for The New York Times
Shay, a two-time N.C.A.A. champion at 10,000 meters, hopes to race early next year, and possibly run her first marathon next November.
Courtesy of Alicia Shay
Alicia Shay, with her husband, Ryan, has not raced competitively since Ryan’s death.
“It doesn’t get better with time,” she said. “It just changes.”
She received a large framed photograph of Ryan Shay, her husband, at the starting line of his last race, in New York nearly three years ago. He expected to make the United States Olympic marathon team that morning in Central Park. Instead, he had little more than an hour to live.
She could not hang the picture for months. Eventually she did, but then she took it down. She hung it again. She took it down. She hung it again. It stayed, in the living room, facing the front door.
“I hope it reminds people how precious life can be,” she said. Her wedding band glistened on her left hand.
Shay, 28, has been portrayed in biographical shorthand as a young, grieving widow. But that is not her story, she said, and that is not her future.
A two-time N.C.A.A. champion at 10,000 meters, she has not raced since her husband’s death. But she has her sights on a race early next year, and maybe another — a big one, her first marathon — next November.
Yes, Alicia Shay is running again. Not from anything, really, but toward something. She is not sure what.
“I’m ready to compete again,” she said. “I can feel it in my body. I can feel it in my stride.”
Shay grew up on a cattle ranch in Wyoming, won her titles at Stanford, and spends much of her time running narrow trails through the pine forests surrounding this mountain town in northern Arizona.
Her mind, however, is often on New York.
She and Ryan met in Manhattan, at Rosie O’Grady’s on 46th Street, after the 2005 New York City Marathon. (He ran. She did not.)
He died in Manhattan on Nov. 3, 2007. Shay saw him pass the four-mile mark of the Olympic trials, the elite race held the day before that year’s marathon. She sprinted to see him at seven miles. He never made it. Ryan Shay collapsednear the Central Park Boathouse and was rushed to Lenox Hill Hospital. Alicia Shay arrived just in time to witness the unsuccessful attempts to resuscitate him. An autopsy said he died of natural causes after he developed an irregular heartbeat. He was 28. He and Alicia had been married less than four months.
She returned to New York a year later. It was a whirlwind of kind gestures, sympathetic hugs and well-meaning smiles.
Her next visit will be for next weekend’s marathon. She will cheer friends and family, including Doug Tumminello, her sister’s husband; and Sara Shay, Ryan’s sister. Mostly, though, she wants to recapture all the blurred memories at her own speed.
“I thought that going out there once would make it easy from then on forward,” Shay said. “But to be honest, I’m nervous and emotional about it. When I think about Central Park and the streets of New York, it makes me tremble inside.”
She added: “I just want to go and sit down on that hill where Ryan passed away. And I want to cry.”
But New York represents more than reflection. Shay wants to run marathons, as her husband did.
“If I could run the New York marathon, where Ryan and I met, where Ryan breathed his last breath, yes, that would be full circle — and sad, and incredible, and all those things,” she said. “That would be a dream. That would be an absolute dream.”
The corner house on the south side of Flagstaff where Shay moved about 18 months ago usually has a half-dozen cars parked in front. They belong to an ever-changing platoon of distance runners in training. Some stay a couple of weeks, some stay a year. They pay what they can afford. One of the runners this fall is Stephan Shay, Ryan’s younger brother.
The wood-paneled basement has a treadmill, a weight machine, a vibration platform, a massage chair, a pool table and a large television. A rack is filled with Hammer Nutrition products that Alicia Shay sells — drinks, supplements, gels, bars, canisters of powders.
An empty trash can sits on the back porch. Shay and others fill it with ice water and stand in it after workouts. It is in full view of neighbors.
“They’ll say: ‘What are you doing? Is that a hostel? Is that an Olympic training center?’ ” Shay said. “They just want to know what all the skinny people are doing running up and down the streets.”
Shay is happy to be one of them again. As Alicia Craig, she thought her career was over because of a neck injury in December 2004. Then she met Ryan, who saw her potential tortuously trapped. He found the chiropractor who fixed what the neurologists could not, with one jarring, strong-gripped maneuver.
Running again, Shay won the 20-kilometer women’s national championship in September 2007.
She has not raced since. After Ryan died, Shay tried to focus on her own bid for the Olympics. The United States track trials were in the summer of 2008.
“It was my goal, and Ryan’s dream for me,” she said. “I thought if I made the Olympic team, it would prove that I would be O.K. I wouldn’t be this crushed, broken woman.”
She paused. “It was totally irrational,” she said.
Everything came unspooled in the spring. Shay lost all energy. She would rest a couple of weeks, start training, stop. Then she strained her abdomen chasing her pug, Cody, down a steep driveway. That was it. She pulled out of a warm-up race, then the trials.
“The pug fiasco,” Shay said. “Poor Cody. It wasn’t his fault. If it wasn’t that, it would have been something else.”
She said she had adrenal fatigue, and a doctor said it could be up to two years before she felt fully healthy. She also learned that she had celiac disease and switched to a gluten-free diet, she said.
Last spring — two years later, almost exactly — she felt like her old self again.
She had bridged the gap by coaching with the Run Smart Project, where runners of any ability can get tailored, online training from former collegiate runners.
“It was the start of moving forward,” she said.
Shay brought her knowledge of nutrition, which she studied at Stanford, and her racing pedigree.
“It’s kind of a two-for-one deal,” said Vince Sherry, one of Run Smart’s co-founders and a coach in Flagstaff. “She brings more to the table, I’d say, than any of us.”
Sherry and Mike Smith, an old friend of Ryan Shay’s and another Run Smart coach, said they have seen her smile more recently than ever.
“Not a mouth smile,” Smith said, “but her real smile.”
Yes, Alicia Shay is running again. She is up to 60 miles a week, and plans to ratchet up to 90 miles in the coming weeks.
“She’s hungry for it,” her sister Lisa Renee Tumminello said. “I can feel that resolve in her voice. ‘I want to race.’ That’s a big step, I think.”
No one ever knows exactly where running leads. Shay understands that better than most. But she will keep going anyway, maybe all the way back to New York.

*****************
run for your life
*****************

Thursday, October 21, 2010

What's REALLY the point of the illustrious BQ?

This past Monday, many runners participated in a different kind of race. Not with shoes, but with their fingers on the keyboard. The following well written article sums up the current "state of Boston." I agree with the comments whole heartedly, with the possible exception of eliminating the charity or VIP's. I firmly believe if Boston is to keep its allure, it should be about qualifiers and not "free passes". After all, there are many marathons around the country where one may run for charitable causes.
O.


Boston, We Have a Problem

What's REALLY the point of the illustrious BQ?
By Marc Chalufour
As featured in the Web Only issue of Running Times Magazine
Last spring, Running Times published a story I wrote about the allure of the Boston Marathon’s qualifying times. From my earliest days as a runner, now two decades ago, I bought into the Boston myth. Qualifying times made Boston different, special. They gave serious, if not elite, runners a sense of greater purpose and, for the lucky ones, accomplishment. It mattered little to me that the qualifying times were once nothing but a means of controlling the field size. In fact, because they served that role so admirably, they increased the race’s aura of exclusivity. 

No more.

On Monday, the 115th Boston Marathon sold out in 8 hours and 3 minutes (1,576 hours faster than last year — but who’s counting), leaving many qualified athletes frustrated and angry. East coasters who worked a full day missed the registration window entirely. West coasters coming off a night shift probably slept through it. Boston is at risk of becoming just another big-city marathon. Worse yet, it might already be there.

For most of the 20th century, Boston was special because it was the first and, practically, the only marathon around. It had a storied history before the founders of New York and Chicago and London had even been born. Since the 1970s running boom, Boston’s role has shifted in a fascinating way. Elite fields elsewhere have long since eclipsed Boston’s, but qualifying times have created an entirely different caché. Boston became the race that everyone wanted to run, not just watch.

Qualifying for Boston never explicitly guaranteed entry, but it felt that way. If you qualified, you had months to register. No need to worry about being perched at your keyboard at 8:59 a.m., credit card in hand, waiting for some IT guy to flip a switch. But now, alas, you’ve got to clear that hurdle as well. About 20,000 did just that on Monday. For the others, it was like acing their finals — then being told there wasn’t enough seating for them at graduation.

That’s a shame.

There are plenty of other races that feel special because of the rush to enter: New York, Marine Corps, London. These are great marathons that anyone would be lucky to run. But they’re not Boston — unless Boston becomes more like them.

For as long as there have been qualifying standards — longer, even — there have been grumblings about their equity. Some have found the concept too exclusionary (see Track & Field News, May 1969: “Attempts to limit entry have been met with determined resistance ... The athletes are proud of the democratic tradition that allows the world class man, the grandfather, the child and the woman to run together.”). Others feel they’re too inclusive (see Letsrun.com every April). Whichever side you’re on, the facts are clear: More people want to run Boston than the already crowded race can handle.

At this point, everyone has an opinion about how to fix Boston. Following last year’s 66-day registration process, the B.A.A. opted for a modest tweak, pushing the opening of registration from September into October. This, of course, only increased the pool of overanxious qualifiers waiting for Monday morning. For the past year there’s also been talk of increasing the field size, but that must first be negotiated with all of the town and cities along the course. Also, how many more runners could realistically be added?

A lottery system would be another logical option, but what allure would qualifying standards hold if they were but a step toward having your fate determined in a random draw? Decreasing the number of entries set aside for charities and VIPs — 5-6,000 — is another non-starter. Those entries generate far too much good will for race organizers to consider sacrificing them. Besides, when the race is filling in hours rather than months, aren’t we talking about numbers far greater than that anyway?

Tweaking the system no longer make sense; demand is simply too great.

From a business perspective, this seems like a pretty good problem to have. Publicity? Popularity? Money in the bank? What’s the worry?! But what’s the corresponding cost of bitter, left-out qualifiers? Or entrants frustrated by a maddening registration process that’s at the mercy of the B.A.A.’s website and servers? Or, worst of all, what about about a problem Boston’s never faced: apathy?

A friend forwarded an email to me on Monday evening, from a running buddy of hers. “I didn't get to register,” her friend had written. “Oh well, guess that decides that.”

“Oh well”! Where’s the indignation? The devastation? The profanity?


Boston will always have its history, but its allure to the 21st century marathoner isn’t guaranteed. There are too many other great races to choose from — races with faster courses, fancier amenities, and easier entry procedures.

For a few years, I’ve harbored a fantasy that the B.A.A. could stimulate the gradually-slowing marathon population by systematically lowering its qualifying standards over several years. Now, they just might have the impetus to do this. Like a track meet official inching the high jump bar higher, they could nudge the masses to push themselves just a little faster each year. 

As a first step, they could eliminate the 59-second cushion currently granted to qualifiers (if your BQ is 3:10, that actually means 3:10:59). But that, also, is just a tweak. As a second step, they should lower the qualifying standards for the first time since 1980. Without sacrificing the age and gender diversity that’s been introduced in the three decades since then, challenge all of these groups to run just a little bit faster in the coming year. 

Returning a sense of exclusivity is the best way for Boston to solve its problem. And based on Monday’s mad rush, the world’s marathoners have earned that gesture of respect.


Marc Chalufour is a former managing editor of Running Times and former communications manager for the Boston Athletic Association.

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Ladies, please (wo)man up!


Boston Marathon 2011 registration opens on Monday. If you haven't already qualified you might want to plan for 2012. Race officials expect registration to reach capacity in record time. The article below brings up a valid point. Why do women get an extra thirty minutes? Based on average marathon times, the gap is closer to twenty minutes than thirty.

In my humble opinion, 3:40 for women (age 18-34) is a joke. In year's past women under 40 were required to run 3:20 and 3:30 for ladies over 40. Why so much easier today? Obviously, money is a big factor. More runners means more money. Welcome to JogFest.

I truly believe if the BAA  were to toughen the qualifying standards, marathon times will improve. I know runners, men and women, would train harder and smarter. The runners interested in qualifying for Boston would work their tails off, for years if need be, to get to Hopkington.

What do you say BAA?

********************************************************************

It's Time for Women to Run Faster

Boston's Crowded Marathon Prompts a Gender War; Why Females Get an Extra 30 Minutes

If you're interested in running next year's Boston Marathon, you'd better get set.
Race officials say the marathon's 21,000 prized slots, which used to take six months to distribute, could be filled in a matter of days after registration opens on Monday. In fact, every spot could be taken before the ING New York City Marathon—the nation's largest—takes place on Nov. 7. If that happens, New York's race would effectively be eliminated for the first time as a qualifier for next year's Boston.
The record demand for Boston slots has much to do with the exploding popularity of marathons in the U.S.: The 10% growth in participation last year was the largest spurt in 25 years. The number of runners who qualify for Boston now far exceeds the available places (excluding about 5,000 spots reserved for charity runners).
Associated Press
Runners cross the Verrazano Narrows Bridge at the start of last year's New York Marathon.
But there's another possible reason for the surging demand—one that has the potential to kick up a fair amount of controversy. It's the notion that the qualifying standards for women are too soft.
By all accounts, the running boom is being fueled by women more than men. Women made up 42% of finishers in the 2010 Boston race—a proportion that is higher than the percentage of all U.S. marathoners who are women. But according to gender rules instituted in 1977, the marathon times women need to post to qualify for Boston are 30 minutes slower than the times the men in the same age group have to run. The problem: There's no evidence that women really need that much extra time.
The typical gap in major 2009 marathons between the world's elite male and female runners was closer to 20 minutes than 30—and has been shrinking over time. For less-than-elite runners, these gaps have created some questionable benchmarks. To qualify for Boston, for instance, a man aged 50 to 54 has to have posted a time of 3:35 or better. But that time is five minutes faster than the time required for women 34 and younger. In a nutshell, to make Boston, a 54-year old man has to run faster than the nation's youngest and fastest women.

Going the Distance

[marathon_promo]
Compare the Boston, New York and Chicago marathons. See elevation profiles, last year's fastest times, recent race-day temperatures and other details.
Some running experts say that one way to reduce excess demand for Boston slots would be to stop treating women like the gentler sex. When the 30-minute qualifying gap was implemented in 1977, "the mentality was, 'frailty, thy name is woman,' " said Tom Derderian, a Boston-area running coach and author of a history on the Boston Marathon. "People don't realize many women today run faster than the men who won the Boston Marathon in the past."
"The women's times should probably be tougher," said Maria Simone, a 36-year-old New Jersey professor who has qualified for Boston. Last November, Ms. Simone and her husband, John Jenkins, who is also 36, ran the Philadelphia Marathon in pursuit of a Boston qualifying time. He finished in 3:25, 13 minutes ahead of her. But she qualified for Boston with seven minutes to spare while he remains 10 minutes short of the 3:15 that he needed to qualify. "The strange thing is, I used to be faster than him," Ms. Simone said.
Guy Morse, executive director of the Boston Athletic Association, which oversees the marathon, called grading for gender "an inexact science." He said no tightening of standards is imminent for either men or women. Mr. Morse added that the marathon's legendary course is too narrow to accommodate any expansion of the field. "Exclusivity is part of the allure," he said.
Getty Images
Teyba Erkesso winning the women's division of this year's Boston Marathon.
The 30-minute head start for women was enacted only five years after the event began allowing women to register and fully seven years before the Olympic Games introduced a women's marathon.
Narrowing the gender gap would align Boston more nearly with its counterpart in the world of ultramarathon racing, the Western States 100—a 100-mile race whose slots are highly coveted by men and women alike. Qualifying requirements for the Western States have always been identical for men and women, says a historian of that race, Antonio Rossmann.
A veteran himself of the Boston Marathon, Mr. Rossmann said the women's qualifying times for Boston "are much softer than empiricism should suggest." Mr. Rossmann said he believes Boston officials have kept the wide gap as a way of compensating for all the earlier years of "keeping women out of the race."
With physiological advantages such as larger hearts and greater lung capacity, men will probably always run faster than women. But elite women aren't that far behind. The women's world marathon record 40 years ago stood about 54 minutes behind the male record; today it's only about 11 minutes slower.
The female winner at last Sunday's Chicago Marathon crossed the finish line about 14 minutes after the male winner. At the nation's five largest marathons—all certified as Boston Marathon qualifying races—the gender differential among top runners in 2009 stood closer to 20 minutes than 30.
Running USA, a research center based in Colorado, has collected raw data from nearly 500 marathons across the country that show a median gender difference of about 28 minutes in finishing times. But similar data also show that while men tend to finish in a long line from fastest to slowest, women divide into two distinct groups—one that's fast and another that's considerably slower.
Running experts say the second grouping, which tends to move as a pack, drags down the median finishing times for all women. "Women are social and tend to tackle new goals with a close friend or group of girlfriends more often than men," says a report on the Running USA website.
[RUNNING]
If Boston raised its qualifying standards, it's possible that more women would fail to qualify. But many others would likely pick up the pace. At a marathon in Oregon in May, Julie Fingar of Sacramento, Calif., a pro runner who works as a pacesetter, led several hundred runners, mostly women, at a pace designed to finish just under 3:40, the Boston qualifying time for women 34 and under. "If they tightened the standards, I think most of those women would just run faster," she said.
In any event, runners who've already qualified and who hope to register for next spring's Boston marathon won't be taking any chances on Monday.
"Everybody's worried that it might fill up the first day," said Boston veteran Jennifer Lashua of San Francisco.
Write to Kevin Helliker at kevin.helliker@wsj.com and David Biderman atDavid.Biderman@wsj.com
Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Monday, October 11, 2010

Epic battle in Chicago


The 2010 Chicago Marathon lived up to all the pre-race hype. The race was fast and furious, 
especially with the warm and sunny conditions. The race is an instant classic in the world of 
marathons. This race is a must see for the track/running aficionado. If you were not a fan 
of Wanjiru and Kebede, you will be now.
O.
*******************************************
Sunday, 10 October 2010

Wanjiru and Shobukhova defend titles in Chicago


10 October 2010 - Chicago, USA - Though the marathon is portrayed as a great physical challenge, Sunday's (10) Bank of America Chicago Marathon winners triumphed by using their minds.

The defending champions of this IAAF Gold Label Road Race, Sammy Wanjiru and Lilya Shobukova, took drastically different paths to their victories.  Kenya's Wanjiru battled Ethiopia's Tsegaye Kebede nearly until the race's final 400 metre straightaway before claiming victory by 19 seconds in 2:06:24.  Shobukova passed early leader and race runner-up Astede Baysa near the 21 mile mark and won by over three minutes in a new Russian national record of 2:20:25.

The win should sew up the World Marathon Majors (WMM) titles for both Wanjiru and Shobukova, which are worth $500,000 each.  In addition Wanjiru and Shobukova won $115,000 in prize and time bonus money. The only way Wanjiru could not claim the WMM men's prize is if Kebede runs and wins the ING New York City Marathon on 7 November, an unlikely scenario, but Kebede didn't rule it out, saying at the post race press conference that he would return home, recover, and then decide if he will attempt the double. 
One of the most consistent top performers on the marathon circuit, Kebede appeared a bit shell shocked afterwards, having surged away from Wanjiru several times during the closing stages of the race, only to have Wanjiru come back and pass him within 600 metres of the finish on the course's only hill, the railway overpass on Roosevelt Road.

Wanjiru - In a marathon, 'You go to war'

"You have to think," said Wanjiru.  "You go to war, you are fighting."  For Wanjiru the battle was as much with himself as Kebede. 

Struggling all through 2010 with injuries to his back and right knee, followed by a stomach virus that set him back three weeks prior to the Chicago race, Wanjiru almost didn't make it to the starting line.  His manager, Federico Rosa, said that the virus caused Wanjiru to miss three days of training and his last long run before the event.  Both knew that Wanjiru wasn't in peak form, but decided to come anyway with less ambitious goals.

"Going in we thought second or third would be a success," said Rosa, and when Kebede repeatedly dropped Wanjiru with surges, it appeared that he'd have to settle for one of those spots. "I was losing hope," said Wanjiru, of failing to be able to stay with Kebede's surges.  But he never lost his fighting spirit or his guile.  

As Kebede got a gap on him, Wanjiru moved toward the curb on one side of the road while Kebede 
stayed in the middle.  The tactic served two purposes for Wanjiru who knew the course from last year's win, but also he was able to "hide" from his opponent, giving him, perhaps, a false sense of securityor a belief that he had broken Wanjiru and the race was won.  When Sammy covered Tsegaye's last surge and the pair was together nearing the Roosevelt rise, Rosa couldn't believe his eyes.  "I've never seen anything like it," Rosa said of Wanjiru's repeated comeback when he knew his runner was not physically at his best. "It was the greatest surprise I have ever seen in my life."

"I was not really in the best shape," said Wanjiru.  "I pushed the body." 

Kebede pushed his body to the max as well, but both he and Rosa knew that Wanjiru was the faste
r finisher and when Sammy was still with him at the end, he found he could not respond to the jet like surge Wanjiru threw on the hill and closing downhill straightaway.  The rising heat - the temperature climbed into the 70s by the time they reached the finish line - was given as the reason the pace slowed from the 1:02:37 pace the leaders went through at halfway, but it encouraged Wanjiru.  From the time he spent in Japan, where he was recruited to run at age 16, Wanjiru had become used to running in both high heat and humidity, so he took an "ownership" of sorts with the climate, believing that it played to his advantage.  

"I try," said Kebede. "I am happy.  This is not the end. I will run again.  It is a chance, you know, 
sometime up... The tactic was to start slow, but the pace was very slow.  I was feeling good, that's why I was running up next to the pacemakers.  I try to push three times. I did not (wonder what) Sammy was doing (when he was "hiding"). I was running to win."

Shobukhova - tactical and fast

Shobukhova had a similarly singular race plan and she executed it with precision.  Clicking off 5:20 miles, 
she passed halfway in 1:10:00, and only slowed 25 seconds in the second half.  Baysa could not match that as she followed the pacemaker through the half in 1:09:45 and stretched her lead over Shobukhova to 28 seconds by 30K. But the heat took it's toll, Baysa said, as instead of 5:20 miles, she slipped to 5:40s and soon saw Shobukhova motor past.  

"My shape was perfect," Baysa said.  "Because of that I tried to push from the beginning.  I thought if I push 
from the beginning, I have a chance to win the race. It was difficult for me to push the pace after the pacemaker was out.  The problem was the weather, the heat."

Behind the leaders the weather also took it's toll on 1984 Olympic Marathon champion, Joan Samuelson, who 
followed a pattern similar to Baysa, running the first half in 1:21:50 and finishing in 2:47:50.  "I always run the way I feel,"  said Samuelson.  "I felt good early in the race, but when I passed 10 miles in a little over 60 minutes I knew I was in trouble.  At 20 miles I saw a time and temperature clock and it read 80 degrees. I didn't think I was going to break three hours at that point, but I pulled it together.  In the middle of the race a lot of people were passing me.  Towards the end I was passing people and at 22 miles I could see that sub 2:50 was possible." 

It was a younger American, Desiree Davila who led three women finishing in the top ten to highlight the 
continued resurgence of US distance runners.  Despite the conditions, she managed a personal best of 2:26:20 in fourth place. 

"Not putting limits on things has allowed me to surprise myself," she said. 

The top American man also ran a personal best.  Jason Hartmann was one of two US men in the top ten 
with his 2:11:06, but he recognizes he does have limits.  "I had every excuse to do bad," he said.  "But I chose to run smart.  I just kept focusing on what was ahead of me.  I tried to let the race unfold and run within myself. The last four miles is hot and gritty, but when I got to 40K, I thought, only two K to go, six to six thirty of running left. I have no illusions of running 2:06, but I think I have a shot at running 2:09.  In two years time (at the Trials for the 2012 Olympics) I'll let the chips fall where they may."

A record number of runners - 38,132 - started the race.  Race director Carey Pinkowski said that the number 
of finishers was also "trending" toward a record number as well by seven hours into the event.

Jim Ferstle for the IAAF
-- 
*****************
run for your life
*****************